top of page

News & Info

POSTURE

Posture refers to the way we hold our body while standing, sitting, or lying down. Our genetics play an important role in our body shape and skeletal structure and therefore our general posture. We also influence it through our behaviours, lifestyle, and our conscious efforts to place and hold ourselves in certain positions.

Traditionally, posture has been labeled ‘good’ or ‘bad’ based on specific spine angles and curvatures.

posture pic01.jpg

The evolving body of evidence on posture calls this idea into question. Most people will have an idea of what they believe looks best regarding posture. This will be influenced by societal norms and personal preferences. If we separate personal beliefs from the evidence base regarding posture and pain, health, and function, a more accurate picture would be:

Posture & Lifting

A large number of individuals believe that lifting with a straight back is safe and that lifting with a flexed (rounded) spine is unsafe.
 

GOOD

This isn’t surprising considering if you type, ‘how to lift correctly’ into google, this is what pops up:

BAD

A more relevant picture, if we look at the current research, would be:

FINE

FINE

Biomechanical studies demonstrate that lifting with a rounded spine does not result in an increase in intervertebral disc pressure, compression, or shear strain. Workplace advice to lift with a straight back has not resulted in a decrease in the incidence of occupational low back pain.

“There is strong evidence that teaching people how to lift, or using programs that include lifting techniques such as keeping a neutral spine and bending your knees or bracing your abdominals, are ineffective and are wasting employers time and money”

Lifting with a rounded spine actually appears to be more efficient from a neuromuscular perspective, demonstrated here by position “c”.

 

Biomechanical analysis also shows us that even when we try to lift with a straight spine, we actually aren’t. Position “a” which looks straight to the naked eye, still results in over 20 degrees of lumbar spine flexion (that is approximately 50% of the lumbar spine’s ability to bend/round).

3 postures.jpg

Copyright © Mawston et al. Gait & Posture. 2021

The strongest men and women in the world utilise spine rounding when lifting, and have done so for some time.

Look at that spine position, it most definitely is not straight.

“There is very little to no evidence that spinal flexion is an independent risk factor for low back pain”

Data on these athletes show that they do not present with higher rates of back pain. This is interesting as there is an established association between repeatedly bending forward to lift loads and low back pain. So why might this be?

The principle of progressive overload and tissue adaptability most likely plays a key role here. The athletes will progress incrementally, ensure adequate rest and recovery, allow their tissues and spines to adapt, and therefore become more resilient. They would also avoid sudden changes or spikes in loads, volume, and frequency of lifting. Essentially, they build capacity into their body. Now, if they suddenly did too much too soon and ended up in pain, should we automatically blame their posture? Probably not.

“There is no credible evidence to support the dogma that lumbar spine flexion should be minimised when lifting to prevent back pain onset, persistence, or recurrence”

“There is no evidence that lifting heavy weights with a neutral spine reduces the risk of back pain or injury”

“We do not have credible longitudinal or cross-sectional evidence to suggest that lifting with a flexed lumbar spine is a risk factor for the onset of low back pain”

There are times when we intentionally want you to lift with a straighter spine, for example, if we want to maximise involvement of the hip musculature (glutes etc). We achieve that with a straighter spine and bending more at the hip joint than the back. Context is important, both in relation to the task at hand, the reason for the lifting, and the individual doing it.

Spinal Curves, Alignment & Sitting

The idea that your spine, pelvis, or hips can simply fall, slide, or pop out of alignment is anatomically implausible and unsupported by evidence. Additionally, the validity and reliability of clinical assessments to observe and feel small asymmetries has been called into question. These structures are robust and strong. We have studies showing that individuals involved in motor vehicle accidents remain unchanged regarding their spine and pelvis alignment. The forces required to change these structures are massive, so you do not need to worry about everyday activities affecting this.

Lumbar lordosis (swayback), anterior pelvic tilt, mild to moderate scoliosis (in adults) and kyphosis (rounded upper back and shoulders) fail to show a strong association with pain. This does not mean you cannot have pain if you have these curvatures, it just appears that the postural alignment itself isn’t the key contributing factor.

“Postural, structural, and biomechanical asymmetries and imperfections are normal variations—not a pathology”

“Pain is often ascribed to relatively normal variations and asymmetries, despite a lack of strong evidence”

“Postural and structural asymmetries cannot predict back pain and are unlikely to be its cause”

Sitting posture and neck posture are topical, with both being mentioned frequently in the media and both being blamed for increased pain prevalence.

sitting_collection.jpg

All of these postures are inherently safe and fine. They also all have the potential to contribute to pain if held for too long. Time spent in a position is more important than the position itself.

Postures held for prolonged periods can contribute to pain by fatiguing and sensitising particular tissues (muscles and ligaments etc). In occupations that require individuals to sit for more than half the working day we see an increased prevalence of pain associated with sitting. Individuals who take regular breaks, move more, and even just fidget around regularly, present with less pain than those who remain static for prolonged periods. In this instance, posture is a consideration in relation to pain as you may be able to unload sensitive tissues simply by changing your position. If this makes you feel better, go for it! It’s unlikely you need to make those changes permanent, just change position while it’s uncomfortable.

“A variety of postures are healthy. It is safe to relax during everyday tasks such as sitting with a rounded back”

In one particular recent study looking at neck pain, subjects with 4 different default sitting postures were assessed.

Copyright © Richards et al. Phys Ther & Rehab. 2021

Results found that no one posture contributed to more neck pain than the others. Authors of the paper concluded that:

“The current results do not support the commonly held clinical and societal belief that neck pain is related to spinal posture”

Other results have found relaxed sitting postures, including slumping, protective of neck pain in young adult women when compared to those who forcefully maintain an upright posture.

“The practice of generic public health messages to sit up straight to prevent neck pain needs rethinking”

Established factors that are associated with neck pain include genetics, female sex, depressed mood, stress, and sleep patterns. As mentioned earlier, pain is complex. Posture is very rarely likely to be the sole cause of someone’s pain. There are many factors that need to be considered.

Can We Change Our Posture?

We can influence our posture. We probably cannot make permanent structural changes to it. As you’re reading this, pay attention to how you are sitting or standing. On purpose, round your shoulders forward, stick your chin out, and arch your lower back. That’s one end of your available sitting/standing postural range. Now pull your shoulders back, straighten up, pull your chin in, and tuck your bum under. This is the other end of that range. Within these ranges, the position you attain and maintain is largely down to your own conscious decision and willingness to do so.

Exercise is not going to make permanent changes to our skeletal structure (spinal curves). Exercise can, however, allow us to achieve a position within our available range and hold it there more easily and for longer. Strength training can be particularly helpful in this instance.

One recent study looked at the effect of a stretching protocol of the hip flexors on anterior pelvic tilt (forward tilted pelvis) and lumbar lordosis (swayback). There was no change in lordosis angle and the average reduction in pelvic tilt was 1.2 degrees. In other words, negligible. Studies assessing thoracic spine curvature in individuals with significant kyphosis (rounding of the mid/upper back) due to osteoporosis have thrown up conflicting results. Some studies demonstrate some level of change, in others no change was seen. Where change was demonstrated, strengthening of the mid / upper spinal musculature seemed to result in subjects being able to hold themselves in a more upright posture.

Any exercise interventions aimed at influencing posture must be applied regularly, consistently, and over time. Once the exercise intervention ceases, posture will revert back to its default position and be reflective of the activities we undertake the most and how we most often hold ourselves.

“The winner in this competition-in-adaptation is ultimately the one most practised, that is, the default posture and skeletal structure of the individual”

“Permanent adaptive musculoskeletal changes require physical overloading well above the person’s default daily use. Such an adaptation depends on the length and frequency of exposure to overloading”

At Vitruvian, our interpretation of the current research on posture is as follows:

  • There is no right or wrong posture

  • Traditionally, posture has been too easily blamed for specific problems, with not enough consideration given to the myriad of other contributing factors

  • Any posture or lifting position has the potential to cause pain or discomfort in conjunction with other variables

  • During everyday tasks you do not need to worry about your posture when it comes to injury risk

  • There is no strong evidence to support the idea that lifting load with a rounded spine is worse than lifting with a straight spine

  • Conversely, we do not have strong evidence to say that lifting heavy loads over time with a very rounded spine is totally fine for everyone

  • A reasonable approach would be - as the load gets closer to your maximum ability, aim to have a spine position that is closer to straight

  • Lifting too much too soon is probably a bigger risk factor for pain and injury than your posture during it. Incremental progression in loading builds resilience

  • Getting used to lifting with different postures and in different positions also builds resilience

  • Our spines are robust structures and are designed to bend. They do not, along with our pelvis and hips, simply fall out of alignment

  • Sitting is not inherently bad when it comes to back or neck pain

  • Time spent in a posture is a bigger risk factor than the posture itself

  • We do have an ability to influence posture within limits

  • We seemingly cannot change our underlying skeletal structure permanently through exercise or manual therapy

  • Pain is complex and multifactorial. It is too simplistic, and unsupported by the current evidence base, to blame this solely on posture

  • The best posture is one that moves regularly

19352.jpg

The Vitruvian Team.

The fall of the postural-structural-biomechanical model in manual and physical therapies: exemplified by low back pain
Lederman et al. Journal of bodywork and movement therapies. 2011

Sit up straight: Time to Re-evaluate
Slater et al. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2019

To flex or not to flex? Is there a relationship between lumbar spine flexion during lifting and low back pain? A systematic review with meta-analysis
Saraceni et al. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2020

From protection to non-protection: A mixed methods study investigating movement, posture and recovery from disabling low back pain
Wernli et al. European Journal of Pain. 2022

Association between sitting and occupational Low back pain
Lis et al. European Spine Journal. 2007

Exercise interventions to improve postural malalignments in head, neck, and trunk among adolescents, adults, and older people: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Bayattork et al. Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation. 2020

How do we stand? Variations during repeated standing phases of asymptomatic subjects and low back pain patients
Schmidt et al. Journal of Biomechanics. 2018

Spinal curves and health: a systematic critical review of the epidemiological literature dealing with associations between sagittal spinal curves and health
Christensen et al. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 2008

Neck Posture Clusters and Their Association With Biopsychosocial Factors and Neck Pain in Australian Adolescents Richards et al. Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal. 2016

 

Is Neck Posture Subgroup in Late Adolescence a Risk Factor for Persistent Neck Pain in Young Adults? A Prospective Study
Richards et al. Physical Therapy & Rehabilitation Journal. 2021

Assessment of the degree of pelvic tilt within a normal asymptomatic population.
Herrington. Manual Therapy. 2011

No consensus on causality of spine postures or physical exposure and low back pain: A systematic review of systematic reviews
Swain et al. Journal of Biomechanics. 2020

Posture and time spent using a smartphone are not correlated with neck pain and disability in young adults: A cross-sectional study
Bertozzi et al. Journal of bodywork and movement therapies. 2021

The effects of active break and postural shift interventions on recovery from and recurrence of neck and low back pain in office workers: A 3-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial
Akkarakittichoke et al. Science and Practice. 2021

The reliability of palpating the posterior iliac spine: a systematic review
Cooperstein et al. Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association. 2016

Cross-sectional survey of attitudes and beliefs about back pain in New Zealand
Darlow et al. British Medical Journal Open. 2014

Flexed lumbar spine postures are associated with greater strength and efficiency than lordotic postures during a maximal lift in pain-free individuals Mawston et al. Gait & Posture. 2021

From stoop to squat: a comprehensive analysis of lumbar loading among different lifting styles
von Arx et al. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology. 2021
Safework.nsw.gov.au – ‘How to lift’ training

bottom of page